A scientist has proposed a method to test the limitation of quantum mechanics , by applying it to the human intellect .
The estimation is based on “ nervous action at a aloofness ” orquantum web . This is the suggestion that two particles can share properties , but this only becomes apparent when they are measure . A hundred long time ago , Albert Einstein thought this was n’t possible , and physicists have been looking for slipway toprove him wrongever since .
To test quantum web , physicist John Bell came up with a thought experiment in 1964 to mail one of a pair of particles to a location , A , and another to fix B. A gimmick at each locating would valuate a specific prop of the particles , their tailspin , using a random number author to beak positive or negative spin .
If the measurements correlate ( the mote were get to have the same whirl at each location ) , then quantum web could be testify . Hence the Good Book “ flighty ” , because they appear to influence each other without interact .
Lucien Hardy from the Perimeter Institute in Canada has proposed an advancement on the possibility . He suggest that the measurements of two atom , A and B , can relate to the human mind . He wonders if the mind operates on the immaterial mankind and plays a part in quantum auto-mechanic .
“ [ Gallic philosopher Rene ] Descartes put forth this thinker - topic duality , [ where ] the mind is outside of regular aperient and intervenes on the physical world , ” Hardy said , reportedNew Scientist .
To quiz this , he proposes get two mathematical group of 100 the great unwashed separated by 100 kilometer ( 60 miles ) . Each would be hook up to an EEG motorcar , and the signals from the headset would alter the properties of the devices at each localisation before the particles get in .
If the outcome agreed with the Bell trial , that support quantum theory . If it does n’t , it hint the measurements at each placement are being affected by something beyond standard natural philosophy – perhaps the human judgement .
“ The radical opening we wish to investigate is that , when humankind are used to make up one’s mind the options , we might then expect to see a violation of Quantum Theory , ” Hardy save in hispaper . “ Such a event , while very unlikely , would be staggeringly significant for our understanding of the world . ”
Quantum entanglement is exceedingly utilitarian , so understand it is crucial . Quantum computing , for example , trust upon entanglement , with “ qubits ” – quantum number – allowing more information to be stored in a smaller distance .
Recently , quantum communicationhas come to the fore using the same rationale . If someone intercept a transmission , the particles are transfer and altered on arrival at their terminus , meaning substance can be hard encrypted .
Whether the human psyche also has a part to play , well , that ’s another think coming .
( H / T : New Scientist )
