Members of Congress are looking to produce an encoding perpetration that would “ get the answers we involve ” on the issue of encoding and digital security .
This is a travesty .
In an act of bipartisan showmanship , Senator Mark Warner and Chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee Michael McCaul are seek to make a commission that would waste time and money all while offer no new revelatory reply on encryption , and certainly would n’t alter anybody ’s intellect . denote earlier this year , McCaulsaidthe 16 extremity commission would shape similarly to the 9/11 commissioning , which issued recommendation on how to stop future threat attacks .
Homeland Security aidestold reportersyesterday that they are hopeful the handbill purpose a delegacy would be scar up by the Senate Homeland Security Committee when the next Congressional sitting begin in September .
We already have it away how encryption works , how it ’s deploy , and its pros and cons with regards to jurisprudence enforcement operations . All the inquiry someone could perchance have about encryption have already been answered , and have been for years . Back in the early 2000 ’s , the government had this same debate over encryption , and the technological experts of that geological era exposed the flaws of trying to censor or damp encryption .
It ’s toughened to conceive of a cosmos where the finding of this commission would convert the substance and mind of our blissfully ignorant representatives .
It ’s not like the construct of encryption has change either . It ’s a numerical algorithm that scrambles data — be it subject matter , files , pictures — and make them readable only to the mean recipient or someone with the encryption password . The only change that has occur with encoding is that it has become much morereliable and widespread . Which is a estimable thing .
https://gizmodo.com/the-lawmakers-who-control-your-digital-future-are-cluel-1773599908
I really doubt someone like McCaul , who wronglyblamedlast year ’s Paris attack on encryption , would suddenly realize that encryption is a utile tool that can protect enterprise and citizens likewise . There is no way this delegation , which will most likely result in the same answers we ’ve see time and fourth dimension again , would convince Senator Feinstein and Senator Burr that theirnightmare encryptionbill was a bad melodic theme .
This proposed commission is another way for lawmakers to drag their foot on really passing meaningful legislation that would assist protect folk music like you and me in the digital age . A bill that would necessitate our raw data that is stored on government servers to be encrypted , or one that explicitly bans forcing technical school company to create dangerous encryption back door for law enforcement , wold be much more useful than this proposed military commission .
Here ’s the reality : encoding is not going away , so it would be a good idea to espouse it and harvest the reward . It would be in everybody ’s welfare if Congress embraced encryption , instead of neutralize metre and money on a commission that will tell us what we already know .
EncryptionMark Warner
Daily Newsletter
Get the honest technical school , science , and culture news in your inbox daily .
intelligence from the future , delivered to your present .
You May Also Like
